AI's Generational Battlefield: Who Will Lose Their Job?

A junior coder uses AI to outperform seniors while Microsoft fires 9,000 experienced engineers who "can't adapt." Welcome to the workforce's Darwinian moment.

I've tracked AI disruption for a long time, but this generational clash hits differently. Andy Jassy's Amazon announcement confirms what Gartner predicted: 40% of AI projects face cancellation by 2027, yet companies still bet everything on untested technology.

The data splits brutally: Computer jobs for workers under 2 years tenure crashed 20-25% since 2023. Meanwhile, experienced workers increased. But here's the twist, Microsoft and Google aren't hiring juniors, they're firing seniors. Brad Lightcap from OpenAI revealed the uncomfortable truth: tenured workers "oriented toward routine" face extinction.

Stanford's research exposes the mechanism: When Italy banned ChatGPT, junior coders lost speed while senior coders lost entire capabilities. AI doesn't just assist experience, it replaces it. Law firms halve contract lawyers because AI drafts patents better. Harper Reed's company runs on juniors with AI, eliminating the middle entirely.

The economics are ruthless, as you can rapidly decrease cost by firing expensive employees. One $50K junior with AI replaces three $150K seniors. Dario Amodei predicts half of entry-level roles gone within 5 years, and my prediction is that AI will kill 1 billion jobs before the end of this decade.

When AI makes your 20 years of expertise downloadable in 20 seconds, will you embrace the junior who wields it or fight the technology that enables them?

Read the full article on NY Times.

----